United States v. Harvey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPair, Associate Judge
With the court’s disposition of the jurisdictional issue I concur, as I must, since that result is clearly mandated by United States v. Scott, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978).1 What compels my dissent is the ultimate result achieved by the majority and in the process the cavalier treatment given the prosecutorial misconduct determination upon which the trial court based its dismissal of the indictment.
Having ruled that the court has jurisdiction of the appeal, two issues were brought into focus: (1) whether there was a factual basis for the trial court’s conclusion that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.