Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Harvey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1978No. 10843Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPair, Associate Judge

With the court’s disposition of the jurisdictional issue I concur, as I must, since that result is clearly mandated by United States v. Scott, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978).1 What compels my dissent is the ultimate result achieved by the majority and in the process the cavalier treatment given the prosecutorial misconduct determination upon which the trial court based its dismissal of the indictment.

Having ruled that the court has jurisdiction of the appeal, two issues were brought into focus: (1) whether there was a factual basis for the trial court’s conclusion that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API