Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of assault and batteiw, from city court of Bainbridge —Judge Harrell. January 22, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The trial in the court below seems to have been, in the main, free from error; and for that reason we shall not consider the exceptions which we do not deem to be meritorious. One error in the charge, however, under the' provisions of the Civil Code, §4334, leaves us no discretion, and demands a new trial. The plaintiff in error complains that the court erred in its charge to the jury by summing up and. stressing the circumstances insisted on by the State, tending to prove the guilt of the defendant, and the lack of sufficient provocation by the use of opprobrious words, without a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Hardy v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- State v. GuffeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918