Legal Opinion

Pietrini v. Panicci

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 24, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

It was error to refuse to take proof by the tenant as to the terms of the letting. The certificate issued by the Administrator authorized the landlords to commence proceedings under the law of the State for the removal of the tenant (Rent Regulation for Housing in New York City Defense-Rental Area, § 6, subd. [b], par. [1], 8 Fed. Reg. 13918). It did not determine the tenant was a holdover. Whether the tenant was or was not holding over was a matter for determination in the proceedings under the State law which the landlords, without a certificate, could not commence.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York City Housing Authority v. AwantAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
  2. New York City Housing Authority v. CuringtonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Traiger v. SacksCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API