Legal Opinion

B. C. S. Corp. v. Colonial Discount Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 28, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

This is an action for conversion which calls for the construction of certain sections of the Uniform Trust Receipts Law (Pers. Prop. Law, art. 3-A, §§50 et seq.). Both plaintiff and *712defendant are automobile finance companies. In January, 1937, plaintiff had advanced moneys to the Great Neck Studebaker, Inc., a retail automobile dealer, not a party to this action, to enable it'to purchase four automobiles for resale, and received from it at the time of making the advance a trust receipt covering these automobiles. By this instrument, the automobile dealer, as trustee, agreed to hold the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Chiari & Ilecki, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. General Credit Corp. v. First National Bank of CodyWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Beverly Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Canandaigua National Bank & Trust Co. v. Commercial Credit Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API