Pion v. Pezza
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtStaff, J.
This is an action of contract together with a claim of unfair and deceptive business practices brought by prospective buyers of real estate for the return of their deposit against the sellers after the agreement failed of consummation.
We find no prejudicial error in rulings complained of and properly reported to us.
Plaintiff filed in the neighborhood of forty-three (43) requests for rulings, some of which were denied “because they are excessive.” Rather than deal with each denied request serially we address only those issues raised by the requests argued in plaintiffs’ brief.3As to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Leigh v. RuleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Hogan v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miranda v. AraujoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
- Hanavan v. VrushoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985