Legal Opinion

Hale v. Record

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1915No. 5758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Choctaw County; Action by H. H. Hale against E. W. Record. From a judgment for the defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

The writ of error in this cause was sued out for the purpose of bringing up for review the judgment and order of the trial court dissolving a temporary injunction and dismissing the petition.

It was alleged in the petition that the plaintiff was the owner of and in the possession of certain land adjoining Red river near Arthur City, in Choctaw county, Okla.; that Red river was the boundary line between the state of Texas and the state of Oklahoma at that point; that Red river was a nonnavi-gable stream; and that the defendant was trespassing on the plaintiff’s land, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Arthur v. Board of Com'rs of Choctaw CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Bretch Bros. v. S. Winston & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Schafer v. Midland Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. Champlin Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Aladdin Petroleum Corp. v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Hale v. RecordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API