Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 1989No. CR 89-97PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellant, Anthony Stewart, was found guilty of rape and sentenced as a habitual offender with four prior convictions to fifty years imprisonment. For reversal, he contends that there was insufficient evidence from which to adjudge him an habitual offender in that the State did not prove he was represented by an attorney for each of the prior convictions. We disagree and affirm.

The State has the burden of proving a defendant’s prior convictions. Allen v. State, 294 Ark. 209, 742 S.W.2d 886 (1988).

For the purpose of sentence enhancement pursuant to our…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Rodney Dale Reeves v. Jim Mabry, Commissioner of Corrections, and the Attorney General of the State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Huddleston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Byrum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API