Legal Opinion

Territory of Arizona v. Delinquent Tax List

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1889No. Civil No. 251Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Apache. James H. Wright, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

BARNES, J.

The petition for a rehearing in this case must be denied. The questions presented thereby were fully argued by counsel and considered by the court in the former hearing. It evidently seeks to discuss with the court rather the reasons for the conclusion than the decision itself. The purpose of a rehearing is not to give an opportunity to reopen the whole case for a new discussion. It is simply an opportunity, out of abundant caution, for the court to correct any misapprehension of the record, or' any oversight or omission that may have been inadvertently made. Copper Co.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Thatcher v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  5. Elliott v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API