Legal Opinion

Dell v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court. Hon. E. J. Sbarle, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, C. J.

Gardner, Sliumard and Bumford were the owners of a house and lot in the city of Fort Smith, as tenants in common, the occupancy of which, in the fall of 1863, they abandoned. The defendant, Dell, without their permission, entered and occupied the house for some months; there is no evidence tending to show that Dell entered with actual force, but, on the contrary, the proof is that some soldiers of the United "States army had taken a printing press into the house before Dell entered into possession. Gardner, Shumard and the administratrix of the estate of Bumford, joined as plaintiffs in an…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolin v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Watson v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Kurt Dixon v. Mike LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Kurt Dixon Big Mamou, Inc. v. Mike Lowery, Individually and in His Official Capacity Tim Calhoun, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Louie Caudell, in His Official Capacity as Chief of the Little Rock Police Department City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Kurt Dixon Big Mamou, Inc. v. Mike Lowery, Individually and in His Official Capacity Tim Calhoun, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Louie Caudell, in His Official Capacity as Chief of the Little Rock Police Department, City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API