Legal Opinion
Walker v. Dunham
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1955No. 5828PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
Appellants, James E. Walker, Jerry I. Hill and Bruce Whitaker, were police officers of the city of Phoenix. On December 15, 1951, Walker and Hill received separation notices stating:
“ * * * That you have violated the following provisions of Rule VIII of the Civil Service Rules of the City of Phoenix:
“Rule VIII (b) That you have been offensive in your conduct toward the public, and a ward of the City of Phoenix.
“Rule VIII (d) That you have violated a lawful and official regulation and failed to obey the lawful and reasonable direction given to you by your superior officer,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gibbons v. FinleyArizona Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- TUCSON PUB. SCH., DIST. NO. 1 OF PIMA CO. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Richey v. Neenah Police & Fire CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Mueller v. City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Phoenix Board of Adjustment IIArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & PsychiatryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Stant v. City of Maricopa Employee Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.