Legal Opinion

Casas v. Wornick Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 17, 1991No. 13-90-100-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Diana Casas sued appellees, alleging that she was entitled to damages due to being wrongfully terminated from her employment with Right Way Foods Corporation, sometimes called RAFCO, which was a subsidiary of Womick Company. Appellant’s pleadings alleged four independent causes of action: 1) a claim under the Texas Equal Rights Amendment, Texas Const, art. 1, Sec. 3a; 2) the intentional infliction of emotional distress; and 3) a cause of action based upon the doctrine created in Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Walter W. Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. And Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Collins v. Allied Pharmacy Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Cole v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  5. MacKey v. U.P. Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API