Legal Opinion
State v. Bizzell, Ca2006-04-015 (5-7-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2007No. CA2006-04-015PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Adrian Bizzell, appeals his conviction in the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas for failure to comply with the order or signal of a police officer.
{¶ 2} On September 22, 2005, appellant was indicted for failure to comply with the order or signal of a police officer in violation of R.C. 2921.331(B). Appellant's jury trial began on November 28, 2005. On that day, just before the trial was to begin, appellant indicated to the court that he did not want his attorney to represent him any further. The trial court instructed appellant that he had the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TyreeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Hubbard, Ca2007-01-008 (6-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LisoOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. ColquittOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.