Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1913No. 7868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the Rio Grande District Court. — lion. Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Chiee Justice Musser

delivered the opinion of the court:

This writ of error is directed to a judgment of the district court, rendered in a certiorari proceeding, wherein the court denied a motion to quash the writ and ordered the county court of Rio Grande County to set aside a judgment theretofore rendered by it and allow a defense to be made in the action.

The record of the county court is set out in the petition for the writ of certiorari, and from this it appeared that the plaintiff filed a complaint in the county court upon two promissory notes, dated August 8, 1910, and payable on January…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cross v. MoffatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Everett v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Barra v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Schmidt v. DreyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Doi v. McMurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weaver Construction Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Kirbens v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Wells Aircraft Parts Co. v. Allan J. Kayser Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  4. Brown v. AmenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. People ex rel. Barnum v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API