Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. Lazard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrenceHaney, Circuit Judge
I concur in the result and in the reasoning leading thereto, except on two points.
First. The case was submitted for decision and decided on December 18, 1937. Appellants had failed to move for judgment and to request special findings in their favor until January 3, 1938. The judgment was thereafter entered on January 11, 1938. I agree with the majority that the question as to ■ the sufficiency of the evidence is before us, but on the ground that under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, requests “for findings are not necessary for purposes of review”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCrone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stoltz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Jackson County v. Alton R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939