Legal Opinion

People v. Breckner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

An examination of the Penal Law does not reveal a New York analog to defendant’s prior Oklahoma felony conviction for "Robbery or attempted robbery with dangerous weapon or imitation firearm”. (Okla Stat, tit 21, § 801; People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586, 589.) Robbery under the Oklahoma Statute (Okla Stat, tit 21, § 791), which provides that a conviction may *411be proven by the taking of property "from his person or immediate presence,” is broader than and more distinct from our robbery and larceny statutes. (People v Quinlan, 161 AD2d 280.) In addition, larcenous intent is not required under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Diaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. People v. QuinlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BrecknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API