Bingham v. Foster
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Cowri. Tuesday, October 21. Action on an account for goods sold and delivered. Jury trial. Yerdictand judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The further facts, necessary to an understanding of the points ruled are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
i jury and verdict. I. The record shows that upon the submission of the case to the jury, the parties, by their attorneys, stipuMted that if the jury should agree upon a ver<ffct before the opening of the court next morning, they should seal the same, deliver it to their bailiff and separate, which was accordingly done.
Upon the opening of the court in the morning, the jurors being present were polled, and one answered that it was not his verdict. Appellant now assigns as error the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict for this reason.
The only error committed was in allowing the jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Manix v. MalonySupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Sturgeon v. FerronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coker v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
- Bryson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Griffin & Adams v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Dunbauld v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Hamp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.