Legal Opinion

Roth v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1827PublishedCited by 6 opinions

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton county. The plaintiffs in error, Peter Both and John Both, were also plaintiffs below, and Jacob Miller and Jacob Bauer defendants. There was a third defendant, George Keim, as to whom the sheriff, (being permitted to amend his return,) returned nihil habet. The action was debt upon a bond, in which the obligors were called executors of the estate of.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton county. The plaintiffs in error, Peter Both and John Both, were also plaintiffs below, and Jacob Miller and Jacob Bauer defendants. There was a third defendant, George Keim, as to whom the sheriff, (being permitted to amend his return,) returned nihil habet. The action was debt upon a bond, in which the obligors were called executors of the estate of. Conrad Both; the penalty of which was three thousand nine hundred and sixty-two dollars, sixty-nine cents, and the condition as follows. “Whereas David Musselman, by seven certain…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Duncan, J.

This case does not come up in the most lucid order, It takes some pains to relieve it from the obscurity, in which on a first view it appears to be involved; but, when it is understood, it presents a very clear case.

It was an action on an obligation of indemnity, reciting that David Mussleman, by seven certain obligations, bearing even date herewith, together with Peter Roth and John Roth, did stand bound to the heirs of Conrad Roth, deceased, in the sum *105of three thousand nine hundred and sixty-two dollars, to be paid in seven instalments by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bender v. FrombergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. McFerran v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
  2. Hutchinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  3. Roop v. BrubackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  4. Bauer v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  5. Jones v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API