Legal Opinion

In re Ernst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Application by Alois L. Ernst for an order to compel one Hawes to pay over money collected as attorney for applicant. From an order denying the application, said Ernst appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.

From the moving papers it appears that in January, 1895, Charles Casper & Co., a domestic corporation, executed and delivered to the petitioner, Alois L. Ernst, its promissory note for $1,500, and as collateral security for the payment of the same it assigned to him certain fire insurance policies. Thereafter the property covered by the policies was destroyed by fire, and, certain insurance companies and underwriters having failed and neglected to pay their proportionate amount of the loss, the respondent, Hawes, as attorney for this petitioner, and also as the attorney for one Ridgway (who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Application of RabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. In re RABYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Landro v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API