Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pfenninger v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 13, 2001Published

1DissentColeman, J.

I cannot join in the majority’s opinion, which “give[s] plaintiff yet another bite of this thoroughly-chewed apple, ... [because] [t]he route to that result converts us from the Court of last resort, *244to some sort of super rescue-mission.” Whitfield v. Blackwood, 101 N.J. 500, 500-01, 502 A.2d 1132 (1986) (Clifford, J., concurring) (citation omitted). The majority has concluded that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying plaintiff’s request for expanded discovery, and therefore remands this case. The Appellate Division rejected that claim. Yet, the majority’s opinion reopens the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and DevelopersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API