Legal Opinion

McKay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 2008No. 3D07-3141PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

988 So.2d 51 (2008)

Ernest McKAY, Petitioner,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D07-3141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 9, 2008.

Ernest McKay, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.

2Per curiam

Ernest McKay filed a pro se petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Although his petition was untimely under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(B), he asserts that consideration of his claim is necessary to avoid a manifest injustice. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

McKay…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Borel v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. & SC13-2112 Corey Smith v. State of Florida and Corey Smith v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  3. LAVORIS JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Kerney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Hilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API