Mitchell v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentAdkins, Judge
Although I agree with the majority that Timothy Mitchell should have been allowed to allocute before he was sentenced for criminal contempt of court, I am, nevertheless constrained to dissent. I believe that under the circumstances of this case the judge who was the object of Mitchell’s contemptuous gesture should not have conducted the summary contempt proceeding.
After a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found Mitchell guilty of felony theft the judge presiding in that court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for fifteen years — the maximum penalty for that offense. Maryland…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.