Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1990No. 115, September Term, 1989Published

1DissentAdkins, Judge

Although I agree with the majority that Timothy Mitchell should have been allowed to allocute before he was sentenced for criminal contempt of court, I am, nevertheless constrained to dissent. I believe that under the circumstances of this case the judge who was the object of Mitchell’s contemptuous gesture should not have conducted the summary contempt proceeding.

After a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found Mitchell guilty of felony theft the judge presiding in that court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for fifteen years — the maximum penalty for that offense. Maryland…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  5. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API