Legal Opinion
Mechanics Bank v. Chardavoyne
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 20, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On writ of error to the Essex Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought against •William S. Chardavoyne and .Annie N, his wife, upon a promissory note made by William to the order of Annie, and endorsed by her. The note is dated Newark, July 28th, 1899, and is payable at the Mechanics Bank, Brooklyn, New York. The case was tried by the court without a jury, by consent of the parties. The following are the pertinent facts found by the trial court: Mrs. Chardavoyne, about ten days or two weeks before July 28th, 1899, entrusted her husband with a blank form of promissory'note,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Van Duzer v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Bank of Pittsburgh v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Brown v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ex parte Goldberg & LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- First Nat. Bank of Springfield v. Di TarantoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Wallabout Bank v. PeytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908