Legal Opinion

Kopchak v. Springer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1981No. 402PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an action in equity in which appellants, who were plaintiffs below, seek an adjudication that they have a right of way over appellees’ property, and that as defendants, appellees are liable in damages for trespassing upon the easement and for the cost of restoring appellants’ property to its former condition. We cannot reach the merits, however, because appellants have failed to have a final decree entered on the docket. Instead, they have appealed from the order of the lower court dismissing exceptions to the decree nisi. Therefore, we must quash this appeal.

An order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bogosian v. Foerderer Tract Committee, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Murray v. Abcon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Mercadante v. RanieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re J.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. In Re JWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. In Re: Order Amending Rules 102, 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501-1504, 1511-1517, 1531, 1532, 1541-1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 & Adopting RuleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. In Re: Order Amending Rules 102, 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501-1504, 1511-1517, 1531, 1532, 1541-1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 & Adopting RuleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API