Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Steger

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1960No. A-8093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a direct appeal and our jurisdiction of this cause must rest upon Article 5, section 3b of the Texas Constitution and Article 1738-a, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Stats. In order for this Court’s jurisdiction to attach, it is essential that the order of the trial court granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction be based “on the ground [s] of the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of any statute of this state,” or on a holding that an administrative order of a state board or commission issued under a statute is valid or invalid.

It conclusively appears that the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lipscomb v. FlahertyTexas Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Purolator Security, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. Episcopal ChurchTexas Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API