Legal Opinion
Bateman v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 27, 2010No. 09-55108PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) case, Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Bateman appeals the district court’s denial of class certification. Bateman sued American Multi-Cinema, Inc., (“AMC”) on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, alleging that AMC violated FACTA by printing more than the last five digits of consumers’ credit or debit card numbers on electronically printed receipts in December 2006 and January 2007. See 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g) (2005). On behalf of himself and other consumers who received such receipts, Bateman…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Young v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Stearns v. Ticketmaster Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dewey v. Volkswagen AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.