Legal Opinion

State v. Gammil

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1989No. 10580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated battery, robbery, and conspiracy to commit robbery. Defendant raises five issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for the robbery and aggravated battery convictions because the aggravated battery offense merged into the robbery offense; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment; (3) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress; (4) whether the trial court erred in admitting a card containing defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TantonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. DeMaryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. State v. BachichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API