Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Sinex

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 15, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

iHJusrcTioir Bill.—The bill seeks to restrain the collection of a judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant in this cause-seeks to restrain the defendant from the collection, by execution process, of the amount of a judgment, being $1,100, with interest from the 14th day of December, 1812, and costs. This judgment purports to have been entered by confession on warrant of attorney.

The complainant states in his bill that on or about th& 19th day of May, 1813, he was called upon by Benjamin F. Blackiston, who stated to him that he (Blackiston) had made arrangements with Zenas W. Sinex, the defendant, to borrow of Sinex the sum of $500; that Blackiston re- . quested the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stringfellow v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leiter v. CarpenterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API