Hyde v. Kent

We learn from the record of this cause that on the'19th day of April, 1892, which was a day of the February, 1892, term of the district court for Douglas county, the plaintiff in error recovered a judgment therein by default against the defendant in error in the sum of $1,118 and costs. On the 11th day of May, following, the defendant entered in said cause his objection to the jurisdiction of the court as follows:

“Mary T. Hyde v. L. H. Kent.

“L. H. Kent, named above, defendant, appearing specially and only for the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction of the court, and for the stating…