Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caroline B. Ferenz v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 1956No. 11817_1Published

1DissentMcLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) .

The majority opinion reverses the judgment of the district court because “The referee, who heard the testimony and found the facts, concluded that Mrs. Ferenz was not ‘living with’ her husband at the time of his death within the meaning of that term used in the Act.”

The referee’s decision was based on his conclusion, as emphasized in the court opinion, that “The condition under which the claimant and wage earner might have become members of the same household was never met.” The referee never, said that even if the condition insisted on by the wife had been met, the “living…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Walker v. AltmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Matter of Willis C. Pioch, Bankrupt, Willis C. PiochCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Curtis Company (Formerly Curtis Engineering Company) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Ferenz v. HobbyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API