Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Steffens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1926No. 190PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPannill, C. J.

The, parties occupy the same position here as in- the trial court, and will be so designated. In 1905 Fred Cockrell owned an undivided one-half interest in certain lots situated in Abilene, Tex. J. G. Lowden and O. W. Steffens owned the other half. Plaintiff was employed by all of said parties to and did render certain legal services. As compensation to plaintiff, said parties made to him a deed conveying certain lots, but the lots in controversy were not included in the deed. Plaintiff’s suit was to reform this deed. A count in trespass to try title was in the petition. The defendant Moughan…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Templeton v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Burr v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Stockyards National Bank v. PresnallTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Brown v. BonougliTexas Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hawk v. E.K. Arledge, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
  2. Duke v. GilbreathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Newman v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Adams v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Drane v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API