Legal Opinion

Porier v. Spivey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1956No. 36397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The petition seeks to recover for the separate injuries sustained by the plaintiffs as well as for the damages to the automobile allegedly owned by the plaintiff George B. Porier. No special demurrers were filed, and a general demurrer will not reach a misjoinder of parties or causes of action. Linder v. Wimberly, 158 Ga. 285 (123 S. E. 129), and cases cited. Therefore, no question as to a misjoinder of parties plaintiff is presented or ruled on.

2. “Diligence and negligence, including contributory negligence and proximate cause, are ordinarily peculiarly for the jury and the courts will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. SlatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Shirley Cloak & Dress Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Griffin v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Linder v. WimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porier v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Dean v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API