Legal Opinion

Brown v. Fortner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2008No. 06-3743PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Former Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC) inmate Randell Brown filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against a number of MDOC employees, including Keith Fortner and Eugene Scott. Brown alleged Fortner and Scott, both correction officers with the MDOC, acted with deliberate indifference by failing to provide safe transportation to Brown, thus violating Brown’s Eighth Amendment rights. The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and this court reversed in part, concluding Brown stated a claim against Fortner, Scott, and the other correctional officers…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. James Solomon v. Deputy U.S. Marshal ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. Brown v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. McLean v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Bruce Rogers v. Shawna BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API