Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Ortman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 18, 2011No. S11Y0222Published

1ConcurrenceNahmias, Justice

I concur fully in the Court’s opinion. I write separately to discuss a “mitigating” factor that, although not mentioned by the Court, was considered in Ortman’s favor by the Special Master in making his recommendation to us. The Special Master’s report states that “[a]nother mitigating factor is that [Ortman] has already been punished for his conduct,” noting that, as a result of his criminal conviction for aggravated battery, Ortman was sentenced to a 12-month probated sentence, fined $1,000, and ordered to undergo an anger/violence program. I do not believe that the law or logic supports…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re SkandalakisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. In Re Kota Chalfant SuttleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. In Re PaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. In Re WaldropSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. In re CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API