Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Roderer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1977No. 76-1322PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants contend that the subject property is exempt under two provisions of the Revised Code: Section 5709.08 and Section 5709.121.

R. C. 5709.08, formerly Gr. C. 5351, provides in pertinent part that:

“Real or personal property belonging to the state or United States used exclusively for a public purpose, and public property used exclusively for a public purpose, shall be exempt from taxation. * *

*160An exemption with regard to municipal airport property was dealt with in Toledo v. Jenkins (1944), 143 Ohio St. 141. This court held that, in order to qualify for exemption from taxation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Toledo v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Cleveland v. PerkOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Village of Whitehouse v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Whitehouse v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Airport Partners, Ltd. v. LimbachOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. City of Springfield v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API