Legal Opinion
Tom Lange Co. v. A. Gagliano Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 28, 1994No. 91-C-852PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, District Judge.
The above-captioned ease is controlled by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930 as amended (hereinafter “PACA”), codified at 7 U.S.C. § 499a et seq. In addition, the applicable regulations are found in 7 C.F.R. § 46 et seq.
Pursuant to the PACA, a de novo trial1 to the Court occurred on January 24,1994 on A. Gagliano Company’s (hereinafter “Gagliano”) petition for review of a decision rendered by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture (hereinafter “Secretary”) which ordered Gagliano to pay reparation for a shipment of lettuce in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harland W. Chidsey, D/B/A Harland W. Chidsey Farms v. Bert A. Guerin, D/B/A Bert GeurinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Spano v. Western Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Harry Klein Produce Corp. v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Consolidated Citrus Company v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tom Lange Company, Incorporated v. A. Gagliano Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995