Legal Opinion
In re the Construction of the Will of Hardenbergh
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 4, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stekley, S.
This is a proceeding brought for the purpose of obtaining a determination as to the validity, construction and effect of the bequests contained in the ‘ ‘ Third ’ ’ paragraph of the decedent’s will, namely: “ Third. I give and bequeath a United States Savings Bond, Series G-. of the denomination of $1,000.00 to each of my grandchildren, namely: Richard 0. Hab-DENBERGH, BARBARA JEAN HARDENBERGH, DANIEL K. HARDENBERGH, William Ross Osterhoudt, and Charles H. Osterhoudt ”.
*734The facts appear to be as follows: On October 1, 1951, Edith V. M. Hardenbergh, the decedent, was adjudicated an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- In Re the Accounting of BrannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In Re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In Re the Accounting of National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Accounting of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- Looby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996