Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robertson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 9, 2005No. 1050061Published

1ConcurrenceNabers, Chief Justice

I concur in the decision to deny certiora-ri review in this case. I write separately because the case touches on an issue that merits further attention — the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Alabama courts in criminal cases.

Robertson filed a petition under Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., challenging a nearly 30-year-old conviction that resulted from a guilty plea. He did not appeal that conviction. Under most circumstances, any of those factors would preclude postconviction relief. See Fuqua v. State, 912 So.2d 290, 291 (Ala.Crim.App.2005)(guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Lamar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Woolf v. McGaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Lámar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API