Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 1963No. [App. No. 75, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

233 Md. 607 (1963)

195 A.2d 612

THOMAS

v.

WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 75, September Term, 1963.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 10, 1963.

Before the full Court.

2Per curiam

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of Judge Foster in the court below, and for the further reason that after a voluntary plea of guilty, entered in his presence by privately retained counsel, all of the irregularities now claimed were waived, and would not have been available, even on direct appeal. Case v. State, 228 Md. 551,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Case v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. McNeil v. Warden of the Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Thomas v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shipley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Thomas v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Mullen v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API