Legal Opinion
In Re: Paul Julius Walwyn, BPR 18263
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 2017No. M2016-01507-SC-BAR-BPPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · PageRoger A. Page, J.
in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined.
The Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”) initiated disciplinary proceedings against attorney Paul Julius Walwyn based on a client’s complaint of professional misconduct. A hearing panel (“Panel”) determined that Mr. Walwyn had violated the Rules of Professional Conduct (“RPC”) and ultimately entered “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Amended Judgment of the Hearing Panel” (“Amended Judgment”) imposing a public censure with a practice monitor for one year and six…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Sean K. Hornbeck v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re: James Carl Cope, BPR 03340Tennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- Nathan E.Brooks v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
- Brian Philip Manookian v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (Dissenting)Tennessee Supreme Court · 2024
- Colleen Ann Hyder v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.