Legal Opinion · Dissent
Fawcett v. Manny
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1933No. 23669. En BancPublished
1DissentHolcomb, J.
(dissenting) — For the reasons stated by me in the En Banc decision in 170 Wash. 148, 15 P. (2d) 933, as well as those given by Judge Herman in the Mercer case, 170 Wash. 140, 15 P. (2d) 930, I dissent.
Mitchell, Main, and Millard, JJ., concur with Holcomb, J.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mercer v. LoveringWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Fawcett v. MannyWashington Supreme Court · 1932