Legal Opinion

State v. Kielisch

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 5, 1985No. 84-537PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Carl Kielisch appeals a circuit court order denying his motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued to him by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue. The order also granted the state’s motion to find Kielisch in contempt for failing to comply with the court’s previous order for him to turn records over to the department until the department completes a tax investigation. Kielisch argues that the subpoena should be quashed because the state did not pay his witness fees prior to the return date of the subpoena, and because disclosure of the requested records may violate his constitutional…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. BaggotSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Unnamed Person No.1 v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 Jd 001 v. Mac DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. People v. ShumakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Unnamed Person No.1 v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API