Minthorne v. Tompkins
New York Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor
decided that the-lllth rule "did not apply to the case of a sale under ah interlocutory order of the court; that in .such a case, the 'deed might be executed beforeenrolment. But-if the decree was final as to the whole subject matter of the sale, that it must be enrolled before any. conveyance could be executed ¡ although, as to other branches of the suit, another decree might be necessary before the cause was finally disposed of by the court. And that if a bill was dismissed with costs as to one defendant, the decree must be enrolled be*103fore any execution could issue thereon.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Fiehe v. Householder Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Fiehe v. R. E. Householder Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Wilmott v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- Hochgraef v. HendrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Brush v. ShusterNew York Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.