Legal Opinion

Minthorne v. Tompkins

New York Court of Chancery

Decided March 20, 1830PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor

decided that the-lllth rule "did not apply to the case of a sale under ah interlocutory order of the court; that in .such a case, the 'deed might be executed beforeenrolment. But-if the decree was final as to the whole subject matter of the sale, that it must be enrolled before any. conveyance could be executed ¡ although, as to other branches of the suit, another decree might be necessary before the cause was finally disposed of by the court. And that if a bill was dismissed with costs as to one defendant, the decree must be enrolled be*103fore any execution could issue thereon.…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fiehe v. Householder Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Fiehe v. R. E. Householder Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Wilmott v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  4. Hochgraef v. HendrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Brush v. ShusterNew York Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API