Legal Opinion
Sokol v. Nathanson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendant Nathanson appealed from a final decree requiring her to pay to the plaintiffs certain sums for which they had become liable at her request upon a mortgage note given by them with respect to real estate the title to which the female plaintiff held under an oral trust for said defendant, who controlled and managed the real estate and received the profits. The bill alleged that said defendant promised the plaintiffs to pay the note.
The evidence is not reported. There is no finding of facts. The final decree is within the scope of the bill. It is to be assumed that the unreported…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Nutter v. MroczkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Broadway National Bank v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Margolies v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Schneider v. Armour & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Kearney v. Mechanics National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- MacDonald v. StackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.