Condra v. State

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Walter J. Condra appeals from his convictions for child molestation and aggravated sexual battery involving his four-year-old niece. We affirm.

1. Condra contends the trial court erred in allowing similar transaction testimony regarding sexual contact between Condra and his sister because it was hearsay. When Condra’s sister took the stand, she first refused to testify regarding sexual activity with Condra, stating, “No comment” in response to the prosecutor’s questions. However, upon further questioning, she denied telling the police investigator that Condra had talked…