Legal Opinion

Nathman v. Chrycy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 1958No. 58-307PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

Two suits were commenced to foreclose mechanics’ liens against the same property *784and 'against the same defendants. The plaintiff in one suit was L. M. Penzi Tile Co., Inc., and the plaintiff in the other suit was Raymond A. Chrycy. The defendants in each suit were Jack N. Nathman, Selma Nathman, his wife, and Temco Builders, Inc. Thereafter, other claimants of liens intervened as defendants and interposed their claims. The two suits were consolidated. The court below granted relief against the Nathmans and in favor of the original plaintiffs and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher Lum. v. Verhine Fisher v. R. F. C. Mortg.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beautyware Plumbing Supply Co. v. Columbiad Apartments, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Leedy v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CocoaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Hartstone Concrete Products Co. v. VerkaufDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Miller Electric Co. of Miami v. SweenyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API