State v. Wallace

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant has failed to set forth any exceptions in the record, thereby failing to comply with the mandate of Rule 21, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Likewise, defendant’s four assignments of error are defective in that there are no exceptions grouped and numbered as required by Rule 19 (c), Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. “An assignment of error which is not supported by an exception previously noted in the case on appeal presents no question of law for this Court to decide.” State v. Fox, 277 N.C. 1, 21, 175 S.E. 2d 561…