Becker v. County Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Lafayette Circuit Court. — No». Samuel Davis, Judge. Mandamus is the proper remedy where license is refused by the county court. State ex rel. v. Ruark, 34 Mo. App. 328; St. Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. 600; Bean v. County Court, 33 Mo. App. 635; State ex rel. v. Baker, 32 Mo. App. 98; State ex rel. v. Meyers, 80 Mo. 601; State ex rel. v. Ashbrook, 154 M'o. 388; St. Louis v. Lemp Mfg. Co., 139 Mo. 561; State ex rel. v. Fraker, 166 Mo. 130; State v. Baldwin, 109 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lafayette Circuit Court. — No». Samuel Davis, Judge. Mandamus is the proper remedy where license is refused by the county court. State ex rel. v. Ruark, 34 Mo. App. 328; St. Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. 600; Bean v. County Court, 33 Mo. App. 635; State ex rel. v. Baker, 32 Mo. App. 98; State ex rel. v. Meyers, 80 Mo. 601; State ex rel. v. Ashbrook, 154 M'o. 388; St. Louis v. Lemp Mfg. Co., 139 Mo. 561; State ex rel. v. Fraker, 166 Mo. 130; State v. Baldwin, 109 Mo. App. 573; Sheridan v. Fleming, 93 Mo. 322; State ex rel. v. Reid, 114 S. W. 1116. The alternative writ of mandamus may…
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.
— This is a proceeding to compel, by writ of mandamus, the county court of Lafayette county, to issue to relator a dramshop license in the city of Higginsville, a city of the fourth class and containing twenty-five hundred inhabitants and more.
The only question raised ion the appeal and submitted to the court is whether the Local Option Law was in force in said city. The local option election was held on the 7th day of February, 1908, and local option, in the city was declared adopted.
The general election of elective officers of said city under the law was held on the first Tuesday of April,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Linahan v. BarleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Hahn v. DierkesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Graham v. DeguireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standard Scale and Supply Corp. v. ChappelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928
- Standefer v. DykemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910