Legal Opinion

Cambron v. Pottinger

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 3, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Rees

Affirming.

This is an appeal from an order of the Union Circuit Court denying the appellant, Joseph W. Cambrón, a fee for services claimed to have been rendered by him in certain litigation involving the settlement of the estate of his great-uncle, W. T. Wathen, deceased. Appellant has filed a brief, two additional briefs, and two reply briefs. It is his contention that he performed services beneficial to the estate and, therefore, is entitled to a fee to be charged against the general fund.

A proper understanding of the issue requires a brief history of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Railway Express Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1920
  2. Bailey's Admrs. v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Thirlwell's adm'r v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  4. Howard v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Cambron v. PottingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Johnson v. DucobuCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Raisor v. BurkettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  4. Estate of McCoy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  5. Cassady v. Wolf Creek Collieries Employee Burial Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API