Legal Opinion

People v. Singleton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We hold that the trial court properly determined that defendant was entitled to a disclosure of the identity of the informer in the circumstances of this case and that the indictment was properly dismissed in the interest of justice when the People elected not to make such disclosure. Additionally the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy would mandate reinstatement of the order dismissing the indictment.

With the assistance of a confidential informer, two undercover police officers set up a prearranged meeting for the purchase of $1,000 of heroin from one Gregory Bruce, known to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. DardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. New York v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. MezonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. LittlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API