Legal Opinion

Pellegrin v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1966No. 6839Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAILES, Judge.

This is an action to recover damages, both general and special, arising out of an accident suffered by the plaintiff when he fell through an open manhole on the barge “Barre” which was owned by Union Producing Company and insured by Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. This action was brought against both the owner and the insurer, seeking judgment in solido against them. The trial court awarded plaintiff judgment in the amount of $25,000' for general damages, and special damages were awarded in the amount of $3,188.59. From this judgment, the defendants appeal.

From our…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Leathers v. BlessingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. National Airlines, Inc. v. Beryl Whiteman Stiles, Beryl Whiteman Stiles v. National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API